Research Article | Volume: 22 Issue 2 (December, 2023) | Pages 25 - 29
Role of Human Cytomegalo virus and High Risk Human Papilloma Virus in Breast Cancer
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
Department of Basic sciences College of Medicine, Ibn Sina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq, Baghdad.
2
Department of Internal and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine , University of Mosul, Mosul.
3
Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Ibn Sina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq, Baghdad.
4
Department of Adult Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
May 21, 2023
Accepted
Nov. 11, 2023
Published
Nov. 29, 2023
Abstract

Background: In Iraq, breast tumor is the greatest prevalent form of female malignancy. Increasing research in the past ten years shows that many human malignancies, including breast tumors, are associated with Human Cytomegalovirus and high-risk Human Papilloma Virus. Objectives: The aim of this research was to determine the role of HPV and HCMV in benign and malignant breast tumors. Methods: This retrospective research used 140 chosen formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pieces of breast specimen taken from 100 patients of breast tumor (70 cases of ductal mammary, 15 patients of lobular cancer, five persons mixed from ductal and lobular cancer and ten persons of medullary cancer) and 20 patients infected with benign epithelial lesion As well as 20 pieces of normal breast tissue as control groups. The range of age was 16-72 years. The study was conducted in hospitals and private laboratories in Kirkuk and Tikrit city from 15th January 2022 to 15th December 2022 using the in situ hybridization (ISH) technique. Results: The archival samples collected were related to breast cancer patients ranging from 16 years to 70 years of age, with a maximum age of 73 years in breast cancer and 60 years in healthy women. ISH found that CMV was positive in (25 percent) breast cancer tissues (25 / 100) according to the control group were negative. While in HPV demonstrated (45%) 45/ 100 breast cancer tissues compared to the control group were negative. Of these, The findings revealed that the spreading of HPV-DNA genotypes in malignant and benign cancer groups were as follows: HPV16 10 (20.8%), HPV 18 10 (20.8%), and HPV 31 28 (58.33%). These results suggest that HPV genotype 31 appeared at a greater rate than other genotypes (16 and 18). In 25 (55.6 percent) cases, the largest ratio of co-infection with several high-risk genotypes of HPV 16 + 18 + 31 was observed. Co-infection in the malignant group with other high-danger HPV genotypes was as follows: HPV 16 +18 6(13.33%), HPV 16 + 31 6(13.33), and HPV 18+31 8(17.8%). Positive signs suggesting high-risk HPV infection were detected for 1/1 (100 percent) of benign breast tumor tissues; 30(66.7 percent) mixed HPV infection was found in 45 cases of malignant breast tumors. Conclusion: The results of this study showed a connection between HCMV and high-oncogenic genotypes of HPV in breast cancer patients.

Keywords
1. Background

In developing and developed countries, including Iraq, breast cancer is a widespread malignant disease among women [1, 2]. Studies in Iraq show that most women with breast tumors have a potential prevalence of more aggressive types of tumors in progressive stages [3, 4]. Several risk factors, including possible viral etiology, have been related to breast tumor advancement and development [5]. Several dangerous influences have been found, such as the age of the patient, case history, and long exposure to estrogen hormones. Sometimes, an apparent danger influence may be present in 50%-80% of patients [6]. So, current studies have been achieved to determine further dangerous influences related to humor.

Some studies have reported a causative association between breast tumors and viral infection, such as Epstein-Barr virus, mouse mammary tumor virus, human papillomavirus, and human cytomegalovirus [7].

HCMV is one of the herpes virus families that infected the women 70%-90% of the world’s people. It is reactivated frequently after a dormant infection in the host [8].

Nucleic acids and proteins of HCMV have been detected in a variety of tumors such as colon, kidney, breast tumor, glioblastoma, medulloblasoma, muco epidermoid salivary gland cancer, and rhabdomyosarcoma [9].

One research indicated HCMV was identified by immunohistochemistry test in normal breast tissue epithelial cells and in malignant breast carcinoma epithelial cells, but was higher at a later stage [10] On the other hand; current research did not detect HCMV in breast tumor tissue [11].

HPV is a DNA virus that is often related to cervical cancer in women who are particularly great danger types 16 and 18. It was also observed in anogenital and oral cancer and categorized as an onco virus by IARC [12]. When the combination of the virus to the host cell genome, viral proteins such as E6 and E7 are expressed, and the tumor suppressor proteins P53 and Rb are inactivated [13]. Identification of HPV in breast cancer has demonstrated contradictory findings ranging from 0 to 86 percent in the various studies [14].

Several studies have investigated HCMV, EBV, and HPV in breast tumors with PCR that cannot distinguish viruses in cancer cells from non-epithelial cells. Immunohistochemistry testing will then find viral capsules either in malignant epithelial cells or in non-epithelial cells, giving exact results [15].

Various molecular techniques are obtainable for the detection of CMV nucleic acids. Of these, in situ hybridization (ISH) can be used with freezing cells and tissues using radio-labeled probes or probes with non-radioactive labeling such as fluorescent moieties-biotin- digoxigenin-or enzyme-conjugated probes and cytological preparations and fixed tissues [16].

2. Materials and Methods

Design and Setting

This retrospective study used 140 selected breast tissue . The study that carried out in hospitals and private laboratories in Kirkuk and Tikrit city from 15th January 2022 to 15th of december2022 by using in situ hybridization (ISH) technique.

Study participants and sampling

In this study used 140 selected breast tissue formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pieces from 100 patients (70 cases ductal mammary carcinoma, 15 lobular cancer, 5 combination (ductal and lobular cancer) ,10 medullary carcinoma and 20 patients benign mammary epithelial lesions. A further 20 pieces as control groups. 16-72 years the patients’ age range. A research carried out by the in situ hybridization (ISH) technique in hospitals and private laboratories in the Kirkuk and Tikrit city from 15 January 2022 to 15 December 2022.

Laboratory methods

Sections of thick tissue (4 mm) have been prepared and fixed on positively charged slides. For digoxigenin-labelled cock tail HPVDNA probes for a extensive variety of HPV genotypes including genotypes 16, 18 and 31, an in situ hybridization discovery system (Zyto Gmb)). At the site of sequence complementarity, ISH signals were differentiated as red discoloration as nuclear signs by good use of the Zyto Gmb system.

In tissue specimens, another ISH discovery system (Maxim Biot Inc.) was used to goal DNA sequences using a long biotinylated DNA probe for HPV genotypes 16, 18 and 31. The techniques were carried out according to the manufacturing company’s data. By exchanging the probe with a biotinylated house kept gene probe, positive responses were obtained. Both substances were inserted for negative regulation, excluding the dilute probe. Proper using of this ISH recognition system provides a concentrated blue sign in positive test tissues at particular positions of the hybridization probe (depended to definition of the second difference kit giving the blue color). , the sign was measured in microscopy. The ISH results given ratio grade according to positive signs and the numeral of cells that made these signs.

One piece was stable on the normal slide and hematoxyline and eosin stain, while another slide fixed on the charged slide to be used for CMV identification for ISH. The ISH kit (US Biolol. USA) detection of CMV-DNA was done on 4\(\mu\)m paraffin fixed tissue pieces using biotyinlated-labeled oligo-nucleotide probe targeting CMV-DNA.

3. Result

This retrospective study used 140 selected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pieces 100 patients with breast tumor, 20 patients with benign epithelial mammary lesions, and 20 blocks as control groups from 15 January 2020 to 15 December 2020 in hospitals and private laboratories in Kirkuk and Tikrit governorates, aged 60-73 years, using in situ hybridization.as showed in Table 1.
At the site of complementary sequences, the nuclear signals of genotyping HPV and HCMV- ISH were observed as blue discoloration as seen in Figure 1.

Table 1: Distribution Breast Cancer and Healthy Patients According to Age
   
Groups Study   
   
N   
   
Minimum years   
   
Maximum years   
   
breast cancer   groups   
   
100   
   
16   
   
73   
   
healthy   control group   
   
20   
   
18   
   
60   

image

Figure 1:  Invasive Breast Cancer with Positive HCMV-ISH Reaction. B) Microscopic Appearance of HPV MalignantnTumor

Table 2 demonstrates the positive result of HCMV DNA-ISH discovery, with 25 %(25 out of 100) breast cancer producing positive red signals. Positive red signals were found in the benign tumor group 0/20 (0.0%). None in the control group produced positive signs for the HCMV ISH examination. the positive cases, 12/25 (38%) of breast cancer tissues had a score of 2, and none of the benign tumor tissues had a score. However, the positive results of the HPV ISH finding of 45/100 cases of breast cancer (45%) showed positive red signals. Positive red signals were found in the benign tumor category 3/20 (15%). None in the healthy groupsgaven positive signs for the ISH HPV exam. In the positive cases, 25/45 (55.6%) of breast cancer tissue had a score of 3, while 2/3 (66.7%) of benign tumor tissue had three scores.

Table 2: HCMV- DNA and HPV-DNA Frequency Distribution ISH Signal Scoring Among Malignant, Benign and Healthy Breast Tissues
   
Viruses Signal Scoring   

Malignant tumor

Number %

Benign tumor

Number %

Control group

Number %
   
HPV-DNA Signal Negative    
   
55/100    55   
   
17/20 85   
   
20/20    100   
   
Positive    
   
45/100    45   
   
3/20 15   
   
0/20    0.0    
   
Total   
   
100   
   
20    
   
20   
   
HPV-DNA scoring 1   
   
5/45 11.1   
   
0/3 0.0   
   
0 /0    0.0   
   
2   
   
15/45 33.3   
   
1/3    33.3   
   
0/0    0.0   
   
3   
   
25/45 55.6   
   
2/3 66.7   
   
0/0    0.0   
   
HCMV-DNA    Signal Negative    
   
75/100 75   
   
20/20 100   
   
20/20    100   
   
Positive    
   
25/100 25   
   
0/20 0.0   
   
0/20    0.0    
   
Total   
   
100   
   
20    
   
20   
   
HCMV-DNA Scoring 1   
   
8/25    32   
   
0 /0    0.0   
   
0 /0    0.0   
   
2   
   
12/25    38   
   
0/0    0.0   
   
0/0    0.0   
   
3   
   
5/11    2   
   
0/0    0.0   
   
0/0    0.0   

Table 3 and Figure 2 showed that In the malignant and benign tumor groups, the distribution of HPV-DNA genotypes was as follows: HPV16 10(20.8%), HPV 18 10(20.8%) and HPV 31 28(58.33%) These results indicate that HPV genotype31 appeared at a higher ratio than other genotypes(16 and 18). In Table 3, the overall positive cases referred to may have more than one HPV genotype.

image

FIgure 2: Microscopic Appearance of Human Papillomavirus; A = (HPV 16) B = (HPV18); C = (HPV31)

Table 3: Frequency Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Genotypes Among Malignant and Benign Breast Cancer Tissues
   
Human   papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes   

Tumor groups

N %
   
HPV16   
   
10 (20.8\%)   
   
HPV18   
   
10 (20.8\%)   
   
HPV31      
   
28 (58.33\%)   
   
Total   
   
48   

In women with benign and malignant breast tumors, Tables 4 and 5 show the degrees of co-infection with various genotypes of HPV. The largest ratio of co-infection with multiple high-danger HPV genotypes 16 + 18 + 31 was present in 25 (55.6%) cases among the 46 samples in the benign and malignant group who are positive for HPV.

Table 4:  Combined Genotypes of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in Breast Tumors Samples
   
Genotypes    

Malignant Breast tumor

(N=45) %

Benign Breast tumor

(N=3) %

(n = 60)
   
Single (HPV)genotype   
   
15(33.3)   
   
2(66.7)   
   
Mixture(HPV) genotypes   
   
30(66.7)   
   
1(33.3)   

 

Table 5: Combined Genotypes of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in Breast Tumors Samples
   
Genotypes    

Malignant Tumors

(N =45) %

Benign Tumor

(N=3) %
   
HPV   16+18   

6 (13.33%)
   
0   ( 0.0)   
   
HPV   16+31   

6 (13.33%)
   
0 (0.0)   
   
HPV   18+31   

8 (17.33%)
   
1   ( 100)   
   
HPV   18+16+31   

25 (55.6 %)
   
0 )0.0)   
   
Total   
   
   45   
   
1   

 

 

 

 

4. Discussion

Breast cancer is more shared in the developed populations and is 100 times more in females than in males [16] . Opinion of the increased risk factors of breast cancer are positive family histories, age, the primary pregnancy following 25 years old, menarche, delayed menopause, null parity, long-standing utilization of exogenous estrogens, obesity following menopause, as well as encountering ionizing ray [17]. Other factors that important in the mechanism of increased risk factors are estrogen receptors and estrogen levels, and the adipokinesleptin and adiponectin [18].

In situ hybridization is a technique advanced for identifying particular nucleic acid DNA and RNA sequences for metaphase spreads, morphologically well-preserved tissue parts, and cell preparations by hybridizing the DNA probe’s complementary strand to the target sequence. In the past few decades, cytogenetic cancer diagnosis and treatment methodologies have progressed enormously. The discovery of a landmark link between cancer and chromosome aberration was first discovered in 1960 by Peter No well and David Hungerford, see [19]. In addition, several previous studies using ISH techniques have shown ISH to be an efficient tool for identifying and concentrating CMV-DNA and HPV in the infected tissues. In the present study, CMV DNA-ISH was distinguished in 25 percent (25 out of 100 cases), and HPV was detected in 45 percent (45 out of 100 cases). Unexpectedly, Shakir and Al-Alwany [20] observed that 34.3 percent (24 out of 70) of breast cancers show positive signals, HPV-DNA ISH identification of 18/70 cases of breast cancer (25.7 %) revealed positive red signals. No positive signals for the HCMV and HPV ISH tests were registered in the control group. Breastfeeding is the primary way HCMV is transmitted during the first year of lifespan in nation-state where record women are HIV-positive and breastfeeding (Stagno and Cloud, 1994 [21]). The HPV method of transmission identified in breast tumors remains unknown. The reported frequency of HPV infection in breast tumors has seen a significant change worldwide, reaching from 0 to 86 percent [22]. Demographic features and inherited history may lead to global geographic differences in the prevalence of HPV in breast tumor tissues [23].

In this study, high oncogenic risk genotypes of HPV, such as HPV 16, 1 8, and 31, were found in breast cancer cases. The common HPV forms distinguished are from the high oncogenic community (HPV 16 + 18) despite significant variations in worldwide HPV recognition rates [24]. The relationship of high oncogenic-risk forms of HPV in invasive breast carcinomas has been reported to be higher, indicating a potential interaction with pathology and disease score [25]. Although it is well known that the main causative agent for cervical cancer is high-risk HPVs, the role of the virus in breast cancer is more controversial. This debate could be affected by technological limitations, multiple primer sets and/or detection probes, HPV epidemiology in different geographical regions, different sexual behavioral trends, different incidences of anogenital HPV infection, and probably different population genetics. This makes it much more difficult to diagnose HPV in the breast and can, therefore result in the lack of HPV in breast cancers identified by some investigators [26, 27, 28]. Any research, on the other hand, did not provide signs to support the role of HPV in breast cancer. Wrede et al. [28] and Gopalkrishna et al. [29] performed experiments to determine the involvement of HPV types 16 and 18 in breast tumors. However, nobody of the samples revealed any relationship. A study has been conducted on the presence of HPV DNA in breast tissue in Korean women and the relationship between HPV and breast cancer development, however, no visible associations have been found [30]. During the last period, multiple independent trainings in various areas have recorded no substantial association between HPV and the prevalence and development of breast tumors [31]. The role of HPV in tumors such as uterine cervical cancer has been commonly recognized.

Virons have been reported to be shed from desquamating keratinocytes (goal cells from HPV infections), and high-danger HPVs can be transferred by near-human non-sexual communication [32]. We therefore speculate that HPVs may be transferred by finger from the female perineum to the breast, which may happen during a shower or a bath. It has been well recognized that hormonal influences (estrogen and its derivatives) are identified to be precipitation in breast tumors [33, 34].

5. Conclusion

The results of this study showed a connection between HCMV and high-oncogenic genotypes of HPV in breast cancer patients..

 

Abbreviations

HCMV: Human Cytomegalovirus
HPV: Human Papilloma Virus
ISH: In Situ Hybridization (ISH) technique

Funding Statement

This research paper received no external funding.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this paper. They have all read and approved the final version.

Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participates in the study as needed.

References
  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2010). Cancer Incidence and Mortality worldwide. Lyon, France.
  2. Iraqi Cancer Board, Ministry of Health. (2010). Iraqi Cancer Registry. Baghdad, Iraq.
  3. Alwan, N. A. (2010). Breast cancer: Demographic characteristics and clinico-pathological presentation of patients in Iraq. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 16(11), 1159-1164.
  4. Al-Alwan, N. A. (2000). DNA proliferative index as a marker in Iraqi aneuploid mammary carcinoma. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 6(5-6), 1062-1072.
  5. Hsu, C. R., Lu, T. M., Chin, L. W., & Yang, C. C. (2010). Possible DNA viral factors of human breast cancer. Cancers (Basel), 2(2), 498-512.
  6. Joshi, D., Quadri, M., Gangane, N., Joshi, R., & Gangane, N. (2009). Association of Epstein Barr virus infection (EBV) with breast cancer in rural Indian women. PloS One, 4(12), e8180.
  7. Fields, B. N., Knipe, D. M., Howley, P. M. (Eds.). (1996). Cytomegalovirus. In Fields Virology. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  8. Soroceanu, L., & Cobbs, C. S. (2011). Is HCMV a tumor promoter? Virus Research, 157, 193-203.
  9. El Shazly, D. F., Bahnassey, A. A., Omar, O. S., Elsayed, E. T., Al-Hindawi, A., El-Desouky, E., ... & Zekri, A. R. N. (2018). Detection of human cytomegalovirus in malignant and benign breast tumors in Egyptian women. Clinical Breast Cancer, 18(4), e629-e642.
  10. Harkins, L. E., Matlaf, L. A., Soroceanu, L., Klemm, K., Britt, W. J., Wang, W., ... & Cobbs, C. S. (2010). Detection of human cytomegalovirus in normal and neoplastic breast epithelium. Herpesviridae, 1, 1-10.
  11. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2007). Human papillomaviruses. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (Vol. 90). World Health Organization.
  12. Sim{\~o}es, P. W., Medeiros, L. R., Pires, P. D. S., Edelweiss, M. I., Rosa, D. D., Silva, F. R., ... & Rosa, M. I. (2012). Prevalence of human papillomavirus in breast cancer: a systematic review. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 22(3), 343-347.
  13. Utrera-Barillas, D., Valdez-Salazar, H. A., G\'omez-Rangel, D., Alvarado-Cabrero, I., Aguilera, P., G\'omez-Delgado, A., & Ruiz-Tachiquin, M. E. (2013). Is human cytomegalovirus associated with breast cancer progression?. Infectious Agents and Cancer, 8(1), 1-5.
  14. }Wang, T., Chang, P., Wang, L., Yao, Q., Guo, W., Chen, J., ... & Cao, C. (2012). The role of human papillomavirus infection in breast cancer. Medical Oncology, 29, 48-55.
  15. Zhou, Y., Li, J., Ji, Y., Ren, M., Pang, B., Chu, M., & Wei, L. (2015). Inconclusive role of human papillomavirus infection in breast cancer. Infectious Agents and Cancer, 10(1), 1-11.
  16. Michaelism, M., Doerrm, H. W., & CiantlmJ (2009). The story of human cytomegalovirus and cancer: Increasing evidence and open questions. Neoplasia, 11(1), 1-9.
  17. Ito, H., & Matsuo, K. (2016). Molecular epidemiology and possible real-world applications in breast cancer. Breast Cancer, 23(1), 33-38.
  18. Kumar, V., Abbas, A. K., Fausto, N., & Aster, J. C. (2014). Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease (Professional Edition E-Book). Elsevier Health Sciences.
  19. Hsu, C. R., Lu, T. M., Chin, L. W., & Yang, C. C. (2010). Possible DNA viral factors of human breast cancer. Cancers (Basel), 2(2), 498-512.
  20. Shakir, H. M., & Al-Alwany, S. H. M. (2013). Molecular Detection Of Human Cytomegalovirus In Iraqi Patients With Breast Cancer. International Journal of Applied Biology and Research, 3(3), 454-459.
  21. Stagno, S., & Cloud, G. A. (1994). Working Parents: The impact of day care and breast-feeding on CMV infections in offspring. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91, 2384-2389.
  22. Richardson, A. K. (2004). Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr Virus, and Risk of Breast Cancer before Age 40 Years: A Case-Control Study. British Journal of Cancer, 90(11), 2149-2152.
  23. Sissons, J. G. P., Bain, M., Wills, M. R., & Sinclair, J. H. (2002). Latency and reactivation of human cytomegalovirus. Journal of Infection, 44, 73-77.
  24. Kan, C. Y., Iacopetta, B. J., Lawson, J. S., & Whitaker, N. J. (2005). Identification of human papillomavirus DNA gene sequences in human breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 93(8), 946-948.
  25. Yasmeen, A., Bismar, T. A., Kandouz, M., Foulkes, W. D., Desprez, P. Y., & Al Moustafa, A. E. (2007). E6/E7 of HPV type 16 promotes cell invasion and metastasis of human breast cancer cells. Cell Cycle, 6(16), 2038-2042.
  26. Manzouri, L., Salihi, R., Shariatpanahi, S., & Rezaie, P. (2014). Prevalence of human papillomavirus among women with breast cancer since 2005-2009 in Isfahan. Advanced Biomedical Research, 3, 75.
  27. Khan, N. A., Castillo, A., Koriyama, C., Kijima, Y., Umekita, Y., Ohi, Y., ... & Akiba, S. (2008). Human papillomavirus detected in female breast carcinomas in Japan. British Journal of Cancer, 99, 408-414.
  28. Wrede, D., Luqmani, Y., Coombes, R., & Vousden, K. (1992). Absence of HPV 16 and 18 DNA in breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 65(6), 891-894.
  29. Gopalkrishna, V., Singh, U. R., Sodhani, P., Sharma, J. K., Hedau, S. T., Mandal, A. K., & Das, B. C. (1996). Absence of human papillomavirus DNA in breast cancer as revealed by polymerase chain reaction. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 39, 197-202.
  30. Choi, Y. L., Cho, E. Y., Kim, J. H., Nam, S. J., Oh, Y. L., ... & Song, S. Y. (2008). Detection of human papillomavirus DNA by DNA chip in breast carcinomas of Korean women. Tumour Biology, 28(6), 327-332.
  31. de Cremoux, P., Thioux, M., Lebigot, I., Sigal-Zafrani, B., Salmon, R., & Sastre-Garau, X. (2008). No evidence of human papillomavirus DNA sequences in invasive breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 109(1), 55-58.
  32. Rintala, M. A., Grenman, S. E., Jarvenkyla, M. E., Syrjanen, K. J., & Syrjanen, S. M. (2005). High-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in oral and genital mucosa of infants during their first 3 years of life: Experience from the Finnish HPV Family Study. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 41(12), 1728-1733.
  33. Pike, M. C., Spicer, D. V., Dahmoush, L., & Press, M. F. (1993). Estrogens, progestogens, normal breast cell proliferation, and breast cancer risk. Epidemiologic Reviews, 15(1), 17-35.
  34. Chung, S. H., Wiedmeyer, K., Shai, A., Korach, K. S., & Lambert, P. F. (2008). Requirement for estrogen receptor alpha in a mouse model for human papillomavirus-associated cervical cancer. Cancer Research, 68(23), 9928-9934.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Actual issues of higher pharmaceutical education
Download PDF
Research Article
Immunogenic properties of viper (Vipera Lebetina) venom
...
Download PDF
Research Article
Technological methods of preparation of “Insanovin” tablet
Download PDF
Research Article
Study of lipids of some plants from the flora of Azerbaijan
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright None