Bacillus cereus is a Gram-positive bacterium that is one of the most common causes of food poisoning, a common travel-related illness. The utilization of natural materials, which have been extensively studied for their health benefits, should be considered as natural inhibitors of bacterial growth. Extracts from the leaves and flowers of Plumeria alba have been known to contain various secondary metabolites that act as antibacterial agents. This study aimed to determine the effect of ethanol extracts of Plumeria alba leaves and flowers at concentrations of 25%, 50%, and 100% on the growth of Bacillus cereus. The in vitro study used a true experimental post-test-only control group design. The research samples consisted of eight groups: a positive control group using chloramphenicol, a negative control group using 70% ethanol, and treatment groups with leaf extract concentrations of 25%, 50%, and 100%, as well as flower extract concentrations of 25%, 50%, and 100%. The antibacterial test was performed using the agar diffusion method (Kirby- Bauer). Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software. The study results showed that the ethanol extract of Plumeria alba flowers at concentrations of 25%, 50%, and 100% had inhibitory effects on Bacillus cereus, with inhibition zones of 6 mm, 8.2 mm, and 10 mm, respectively. The ethanol extract of Plumeria alba leaves at each concentration showed no inhibition zones against Bacillus cereus. Statistical analysis using the Kruskal-Wall is test showed a result of 0.000. The post hoc Mann-Whitney U test demonstrated p>0.05 for each concentration of the flower extract and p<0.05 for the extract when compared to the control groups. This confirms that the ethanol extracts of Plumeria alba flowers have an inhibitory effect, whereas the leaves are unable to inhibit the growth of Bacillus cereus, which differs at various concentrations.
Bacillus cereus was a Gram-positive bacterium that caused the majority of food poisoning cases.1 Food poisoning cases continued to increase, prompting various prevention and treatment efforts. The treatment of food poisoning was generally carried out using antibiotics, antidiarrheal agents, and supportive therapy. 2,3 The use of antibiotics, however, could lead to antibiotic- associated diarrhea and, in the long term, might cause resistance, adding complexity to managing food poisoning.4 Therefore, new treatment modalities with fewer side effects were needed. The utilization of natural materials that had been traditionally consumed for generations was also considered as a treatment option.5 One such natural product with potential was the white frangipani flower (Plumeria alba), commonly found in Indonesia, especially on the island of Bali. The leaves and flowers of Plumeria alba contained secondary metabolites that acted as antibacterial agents.6 These metabolites included compounds such as terpenoids, tannins, flavonoids, saponins, alkaloids, and steroids, which exhibited antibacterial properties and showed potential in inhibiting the growth of Bacillus cereus.6–8
Research on white frangipani flowers demonstrated antibacterial potential against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. For instance, the petroleum ether extract of white frangipani flowers produced an inhibition zone of 15.2 mm against Bacillus cereus.6 Although research on white frangipani leaves was still limited, several studies indicated that leaf extracts of frangipani exhibited antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and showed potential as an antidiarrheal agent.9–11 Other studies revealed that extracts from the leaves and flowers of white frangipani exhibited varying antibacterial effects against Bacillus cereus, depending on the concentrations used.8,11 Based on these findings, further research on the antimicrobial potential of white frangipani leaves and flowers was crucial, particularly for addressing food poisoning caused by Bacillus cereus.
The type of research design conducted was experimental to prove the inhibitory effect of white frangipani (Plumeria alba) flower and leaf ethanol extracts on the
growth of Bacillus cereus in vitro. The study employed a Post-Test Only Control Group Design. Antibacterial activity was tested using the Kirby-Bauer diffusion method. The white frangipani flowers and leaves used in the study were obtained from Denpasar, Bali, and harvested intact before being exposed to sunlight.
The samples were divided into two groups: the control group (K) and the experimental group (E). The control group consisted of a positive control, which used the antibiotic chloramphenicol, and a negative control, which used 70% ethanol. The experimental group was further divided into six subgroups: leaf extracts with concentrations of 25% (E1), 50% (E2), and 100% (E3), as well as flower extracts with concentrations of 25% (E4), 50% (E5), and 100% (E6). The research was conducted over six months from the issuance of the research permit and took place in the Microbiology Division of the Integrated Biomedical Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University.
Exctraction of Ethanol Extract
The extraction process was carried out using the maceration technique with 70% ethanol as the solvent. The process began by separating, cleaning, chopping, and drying the flowers and leaves at 40°C, followed by grinding them into a fine powder using a blender. Maceration was performed with a ratio of 1:5 between the simplicia and the solvent, where 200 grams of simplicia were placed into an Erlenmeyer flask and immersed in 1000 ml of 70% ethanol. The mixture was stirred for 15–30 minutes, sealed tightly with aluminum foil, and left overnight to allow sedimentation.
The residue was macerated again with 1000 ml of 70% ethanol overnight, and the maceration process was repeated until the filtrate became clear. The filtrate was then evaporated using a rotary evaporator at 70°C to obtain a thick extract. The 100% ethanol extracts of white frangipani flowers and leaves were diluted with 70% ethanol to prepare solutions with extract concentrations of 25%, 50%, and 100%. These solutions were stored in containers wrapped in aluminum foil to prevent exposure to direct light, which could affect the compounds in the extracts.
Agar Diffusion Inhibition Test
The inhibition test was conducted using the Kirby-Bauer method. A sample of Bacillus cereus (0.1 ml) with a concentration of 0.5 McFarland (1.5×10⁸ cells/ml) was added to a test tube containing liquid medium and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. The extract was pipetted onto blank discs in a volume of 200 µl.In the first petri dish, ethanol leaf extracts with concentrations of 25%, 50%, and 100%, along with the positive control (K+) containing chloramphenicol and the negative control (K−) containing 70% ethanol, were used. The positive control (K+) was prepared by applying chloramphenicol to a blank disc. In the second petri dish, five blank discs were placed, each containing 200 µl of ethanol flower extracts with concentrations of 25%, 50%, and 100%, along with K(+) (chloramphenicol) and K(−) (70% ethanol). The bacterial suspension was incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. Inhibition zones formed around
the discs were observed and measured using a caliper.
Data Analysis
The data were analyzed using SPSS. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine differences in the inhibition zones. Subsequently, the Mann-Whitney U test was employed to assess differences between the inhibition zones for each tested concentration.
The results of the inhibition zone formed by the extract of leaves and white frangipani flowers (Plumeria alba) on Bacillus cereus are shown in Table 1. The inhibition zones formed by the leaf extract at various concentrations, namely 25%, 50%, and 100%, after five repetitions, were 0 mm. The inhibition zones produced by the flower extract showed varied results and increased with higher concentrations.
Tabel 1. Inhibition Zone of Ethanol Extract of Leaves and White Frangipani Flowers (Plumeria alba) on the Growth of Bacillus cereus
Concentration |
|
Inhibition Zone Diameter (mm) |
|
Mean |
||
I |
II |
III |
IV |
V |
(mm) |
|
Positive Control |
24 |
25 |
26 |
26 |
24 |
25 |
Negative Control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Leaf Concentration 25% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Flower Concentration 25% |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
Leaf Concentration 50% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Flower Concentration 50% |
9 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8,2 |
Leaf Concentration 100% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Flower Concentration 100% |
12 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
10 |
Tabel 2. Results of the Median and Range Test and Kruskal-Wallis Value on the Diameter of the Inhibition Zone of Bacillus cereus by Plumeria alba Flower Extract
Concentration |
Median(Min-Max) |
p |
25% |
6(6-6) |
|
50% |
8(8-9) |
|
100% |
10(9-12) |
0,000 |
Positive Control |
25(24-26) |
|
Negative Control |
0 |
|
In table 2, in study group out of 110, 67 subjects were male and 43 were female subjects. In control group 68 were male and 42 were female subjects.
For the flower extract with a concentration of 100%, the largest inhibition zone was obtained, with an average of 10 mm. The research results were continued with a distribution test using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and a value less than 0.05 (p<0.05) was obtained, indicating that the data was not normally distributed. The data was then tested for homogeneity using the Levene's test, and a
result less than 0.05 (p<0.05) was obtained, indicating that it was not homogeneously distributed with normal data. For data that was not normally distributed and not homogeneously distributed, a non-parametric test using the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed. The test results showed a value of
0.05 (p<0.05).
Tabel 3. Results of the Median and Range Test and Kruskal-Wallis Value on the Diameter of the Inhibition Zone of Bacillus cereus by Plumeria alba Flower Extract"
Concentration |
Appeal Group |
Sig. |
Meaning |
25% |
50% |
0,306 |
Not significant |
|
100% |
0,308 |
Not significant |
|
Positive Control |
0,000 |
Significant |
|
Negative Control |
0,012 |
Significant |
50% |
100% |
0,350 |
Not Significant |
|
Positive Control |
0,000 |
Significant |
|
Negative Control |
0,012 |
Significant |
100% |
Positive Control |
0,000 |
Significant |
|
Negative Control |
0,013 |
Significant |
Positive Control |
Negative Control |
0,000 |
Significant |
These results indicate that there is a significant difference in the test concentrations on the inhibition zones produced. The significant differences caused by the flower extract at various concentrations on Bacillus cereus were further analyzed using the Mann- Whitney U test to determine the significant differences between each test group. For the concentration groups of 25%-50%, 25%-
100%, and 50%-100%, the results obtained were p>0.05, indicating non-significant results. When each concentration was compared to both the positive and negative controls, the results obtained were p<0.05, indicating a significant difference between the test groups and the controls.
The research results presented in Table 5.1 show that the 70% ethanol extract of white frangipani flowers has varying antibacterial effects at each tested concentration. The data also indicate that the inhibition zone level increases with the concentration of the extract. The test results of the white frangipani flower extract are consistent with studies that show similar results. In a study using a 70% ethanol extract of white frangipani flowers against Streptococcus pyogenes, which has similar properties to Bacillus cereus, an increase in the diameter of the inhibition zone was observed with increasing extract concentration.8
"The white frangipani leaf extract in the study showed an inhibition zone of 0 mm against Bacillus cereus, indicating no antibacterial effect from each test concentration over five repetitions. The difference in results compared to previous studies is suspected to be due to the white frangipani leaves used coming from different
growing regions, thereby affecting the phytochemical content.12,13 The use of different target bacteria in previous studies also contributes to the differences in results. Other diarrhea-causing bacteria such as Escherichia coli, or other bacteria like Streptococcus mutans, have different structures and characteristics.14
In a study on the phytochemical content of Plumeria alba using ethanol as a solvent, differences in secondary metabolite content were found between the leaves and flowers. Saponin content was found in the flower parts but not in the white frangipani leaves.15 Saponins function to lyse bacterial cells by lowering surface tension and then increasing cell permeability, allowing antibacterial substances to enter.16 Saponins bind to lipids and cause pore formation, which disrupts the bacterial plasma membrane and prevents the cross-linking of peptidoglycan side chains, leading to bacterial cell damage.17 Antibiotics, such as chloramphenicol, used against bacteria work directly by binding to the 50s ribosome and inhibiting the peptidoglycan transpeptidase enzyme, which is responsible for the cross-linking of bacterial peptidoglycan side chains.18 The aligned mechanisms of action in saponins and antibiotics demonstrate their suitability as modalities capable of destroying bacteria.
The absence of these secondary metabolites is suspected to be a determining factor in the difference in the inhibition zone produced against the bacteria. In the test of the essential oil composition of Plumeria alba leaves and flowers, a dominant linalool content was found in the flower parts, which was not found in the leaf parts.19 Linalool damages bacterial cell membranes by reducing membrane potential and causing the leakage of essential molecules such as DNA,
RNA, and proteins.20 This compound also inhibits energy pathways and key enzyme functions, leading to metabolic dysfunction and bacterial cell death. In a study on linalool nanoemulsion, it exhibited antibacterial activity that was twice as strong and 11.5% higher antibiofilm activity against Salmonella typhimurium, making it a potential natural antibacterial agent in the food industry.21 The absence of linalool is suspected to be a trigger for the lack of an inhibition zone, as the white frangipani leaves had an inhibitory effect on the growth of Bacillus cereus, whereas the leaf parts did not. The difference in effect is suspected to be due to the presence of natural agonists that inhibit antibacterial ability, namely the antagonistic and non-synergistic properties of the plant's secondary metabolites when used together at certain concentrations.22
There was a difference in inhibitory effect when using ethanol extracts of leaves compared to flowers of white frangipani (Plumeria alba) against the growth of Bacillus cereus, a cause of food poisoning. The ethanol extract of white frangipani flowers (Plumeria alba) showed a stronger inhibitory effect.
This research can be further developed with treatment determination tests. Exploration of concentrations, target bacteria, and the utilization of other parts of the Plumeria alba plant can be conducted to advance the research in providing further studies.