Introduction- Anthropometric characteristic have direct relationship with sex, shape and form of an individual and these factors arelinked with each other. Aim and objectives: To study morphometry of face. To calculate mean facial index, mean facial height and mean facial width in males. Material and Method – Total of 250 subjects were examined, 250 males were taken measurements of morphological facial height, width, facial index as parameterand age ranging from age group 18-25 year. All measurements were measured in centimeter. Result: showed that the facial index was between 85-89.9 . Mean Facial height in our study was11.14. Mean Facial width in our study was 12.77. Discussion: The present study provides valuable data pertaining to facial index and shape of face in adult MP Population. Summary and conclusion: In our study we observed that the dominant type of face are Mesoprosopic face within 63male.
Anthropometric characteristic have direct relationship with sex, shape and form of an individual and these factors are intimately linked with each other and are manifestation of the internal structure and tissue components which in turn, are influenced by the environmental and genetic factors. The significance and the importance of comparison human remains have been described and which have been coined as forensic anthropometry [1].
Anthroposophy is a naked eye assessment of non measurable morphological feature without use of any measuring device. It is derived from Greek word anthropometric, mean "human" and Skipton, mean "examine". It means judging the body builds by inspection [2].
The human facial counter has always been interesting subject for anatomists, anthropologists, plastic surgeons and artists For the evolution of craniofacial morphology during development which differ among races and ethnic groups, facial index become an important anthropological parameter to categorize human population[3]
Facial index is the relation to the length of face to its maximum width between zygomatic prominences. The dimensions of human body are affected by ecological, biological, geographical, racial Gender and age factors [4].
MEASUREMENT-
Facial index is the facial height (maximum vertical diameter) measured from nasion (The point on the root of the nose where the mid - saggital plane cuts the naso - frontal sutures ) to menton (The lowest point on the mandible where the lower margin of the lower jaw is interested by the mid - saggital plane) with the help of sliding caliper and the facial width (maximum Transverse diameter) measured between the zygion (it’s the most laterally placed point on the zygomatic arch) of each side with the help spreading calip
Table 01: - Facial Height, Facial Width & Facial Index (cm) in Male Population
Parameters |
Min. - max. |
Mean ± S.D |
P-Value |
Facial Height cm |
9.1 - 13.9 |
11.14 ± 1.13
|
< 0.0001 |
Facial Width cm
|
101.1 – 14.9 |
12.77± 1.12
|
< 0.0001 |
Facial Index (cm)
|
69.46 – 105.73 |
87.55 ± 7.90 |
< 0.0001 |
Table 02: Distribution of Facial Index in Male
Facial Shape |
Range of Facial Index |
Male |
Type of Face |
Hypereuriprosopic |
≤ 79.9 |
50 |
Very broad face |
Euriprosopic |
80-84.9 |
34 |
Broad face |
Mesoprosopic |
85-89.9 |
63 |
Round face |
Leptoprosopic |
90-94.9 |
57 |
Long face |
Hyperleptoprosopc |
≥ 95 |
46 |
Very long face |
In Table- 02 shows that the of facial index between 85-89.9 having 63 male by which we can observe that the dominant type of face are Mesoprosopic face within male.
DISCUSSION –
The present study provides valuable data pertaining to facial index and shape of face in adult MP Population. Accurate facial analysis is essential for diagnosis of genetic and acquired anomalies, for the study of normal and abnormal growth and for morphometric investigation.
A total of 250 subject have been examined, 250 males taking morphological facial height, width, facial index as parameter, ranging from age group 18-25 year. All measurements were expressed in centimeter.
Table:- 03 Comparison of Facial Height of male with previous studies
Author |
Region |
Mean |
Ashok K. Pandey |
Andaman |
10.18 |
Sapna Shah |
Gujrat |
10.84 |
Mahesh Kumar |
Haryana |
11.07 |
Vishal Manoharrao Salve |
Andhra Pradesh |
11.1 |
Present Study |
Madhya Pradesh |
11.14 |
Table: 04 Comparison of Facial width of male with previous studies
Author |
Region |
Mean |
Ashok K. Pandey |
Andaman |
13.00 |
Sapna Shah |
Gujrat |
12.09 |
Mahesh Kumar |
Haryana |
13.08 |
Vishal Manoharrao Salve |
Andhra Pradesh |
12.49 |
Present Study |
Madhya Pradesh |
12.77 |
Table 05: - Comparison of Facial IndexVOf male with previous studies
Author |
Region |
Mean |
Ashok K. Pandey |
Andaman |
77.98 |
Sapna Shah |
Gujrat |
89.86 |
Mahesh Kumar |
Haryana |
86.09 |
Vishal Manoharrao Salve |
Andhra Pradesh |
89.5 |
Present Study |
Madhya Pradesh |
87.55 |
The present study entitled “Morphometric study of Prosopic (Facial) Index in Indore region” is carried out with an aim to perform morphometric measurements & to determine facial index in population of Indore region.
The differences in our study is due to various geographical and racial and ethnic factors.